Monday, April 30, 2012

Occupy movement set for return to the streets



By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Campaign 2012
Rachel Powell, a member of Occupy Raleigh, is arrested for trespassing at the foreclosed home of Nikki Shelton at 2633 Pebble Meadow Lane in Raleigh, N.C., Monday afternoon, April 9, 2012. 
(Credit: AP)
(CBS News) NEW YORK - The Occupy movement isn't cool anymore.
Gone are the days when celebrities like Kanye West showed up in Zuccotti Park to show their solidarity - if not much of an actual connection - with "the 99 percent." Gone are the breathless news reports about whether Occupy was about to remake the political system, and, just maybe, society as a whole. Gone, for many, is the notion that the movement even matters: A poll earlier this month found that a majority of Americans say Occupy has run its course
But Occupy has persisted even as officials around the country have uprooted the encampments designed to present a physical manifestation of festering anger over inequality. And on May 1 - the left-wing/labor holiday known worldwide as May Day - the movement is poised to push into the public consciousness once again, with a "general strike" in more than 125 cities for which supporters are being asked to skip work and school in order to take "the struggle against an inhuman system" back into the streets.
In New York, signs have gone up around the city with this message: "No Work, No School, No House Work, Don't Bank, Don't Buy." Organizers say they hope to see 30,000 people converge on Union Square in the late afternoon, after a day of "direct action," to listen to speeches and see music acts before marching south to Wall Street.
The May Day strike represents a combined effort between groups that include Occupy protesters, the immigrant rights movement and the established labor movement, which has largely embraced Occupy's message and tactics. For union members, the "no work" part of the equation is complicated: Under the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, union members could run afoul of the law for participating in the general strike. Organizers are encouraging union workers to participate in whatever way they can without putting themselves at risk, urging them to think about calling in sick, taking a personal day or leaving work early in order to participate in the day's activities.
The strike is potentially particularly fraught for immigrant rights activists who do not have legal status. Among the planned activities is a blockage of "one or more" of the bridges and tunnels that goes into Manhattan - an action that could result in the arrest of hundreds of protesters, as it did when they took to the Brooklyn Bridge last fall.
Organizers say they are trying to emphasize the risk so that illegal immigrants don't put themselves in a position where they could risk deportation.
"There's been a lot of emphasis for those who are taking part in the direct action on making sure that those who want to partake do so in such a way that doesn't jeopardize undocumented workers," said Occupy activist Shane Patrick.
The value of provocative actions such as the blockade is very much up for debate within the movement. "If you're being realistic about it, the time that Occupy has gotten the most attention is when it has had confrontations with police," says graduate student and Occupy organizer Matt Canfield. "I don't think they're going to purposefully provoke, but direct action is a big part of this. Direct nonviolent action often entails police confrontation."
Demonstrators associated with the Occupy Wall Street movement march up Broadway near Wall Street on April 6, 2012 in New York City.
 (Credit: Michael Nagle/Getty Images)
Indeed, the Occupy movement first gained national attention thanks to confrontations with police - including the aforementioned Brooklyn Bridge incident, the pepper spraying of a seemingly well-behaved protester, and clashes with police seeking to clear out Occupiers in New York, Oakland and elsewhere. Yet according to Elisabeth Jacobs, a fellow at the Brookings Institution who has studied the movement, the planned blockade could do more harm than good.
"People have limited patience for civil disobedience that gets in the way of their everyday lives," she said. "It's going to cause a giant headache for a lot of working people and I'm not sure it will have the same payoff in terms of creating energy and movement...I worry that given the status of the movement in people's mind that it has the potential to brand them as sort of trivial hippy anarchists with very little regard for working people's necessities."
Members of the Occupy movement hold fast to what they call a "horizontal" organizing framework, with no top-down command structure. (Occupiers stress that they do not want to be "co-opted" into such a structure, something many say has happened to the Tea Party movement. Some worry that groups like MoveOn and organized labor have already gone too far.) That means that a central figure couldn't really stop the planned blockade even if he or she wanted to. Patrick stresses that those who are planning the blockade are acting "autonomously," though he stresses that "there is a general understanding that people respect the diversity of tactics."
Asked how the NYPD is preparing for the May Day activities, Deputy Commissioner Paul J. Browne said, "[t]he NYPD accommodates lawful protest, and arrests those who break the law." He continued: "Some OWS elements have proposed unlawful activity, but the labor umbrella group seeking a permit for a march and rally has attracted thousands of lawful participants to similar events over the past seven years." (Large banks that expect to be targets of renewed protests in May have taken matters into their own hands, reportedly banding together to gather intelligence on the movement and track protesters. )
Occupy's continued refusal to transform itself into a more institutionalized movement - one with clear demands and positions, direct ties to current and potential elected officials and a willingness to work within the current system - reflects the fact that "any type of movement for social change has to reflect the types of organizing and politics that we want to see in our political system," according to Canfield. Does the refusal to play by the rules as they now stand mean the movement risks trivializing itself? "It creates challenges in scaling up to larger forms of governments," he allows. "But I don't think it eliminates them."
Jacobs, of the Brookings Institution, says "one of the great things about the movement was that it brought people who were disenchanted with the quote unquote system that they didn't engage at all." But she warns that the involvement of a variety of people with diverse agendas in a system with no top-down structure could also end up hampering the effort: "If involving those people means that it's impossible for them to communicate and behave in a way that shows they actually understand how things get done, it stays in a fringe space."
A demonstrator with Occupy Wall Street confronts a police officer during a protest at Zuccotti Park in New York on March 23, 2012.
(Credit: TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images)
David Meyer, a professor at the University of California at Irvine who studies social movements, says there are "ways to lose" with both the Tea Party and Occupy strategies. "Occupy is desperately trying to avoid institutionalizing and getting sold out, and the risk is that you just become completely irrelevant," he says. Still, says Meyer, "You don't have to be directly running candidates to have candidates respond to you."
Democrats largely stopped identifying directly and publicly with the Occupy movement late last year, but you can hear echoes of its arguments in President Obama's rhetoric: The Buffett Rule, for example, is an effort to move toward a more equitable economic distribution through increased taxes on the highest earners. And Occupiers say the effects of the movement are being felt on a local level.
"I think that there's a lot of ways that the society is different already from Occupy," says Rose Bookbinder, an organizer with the United Auto Workers who has taken a central role in planning May Day activities. "People feel more empowered to speak up in their own cities and towns. People are out in the streets much more than they ever have been."
In the weeks and months leading up to May Day, small groups of Occupiers have been engaging in activities such as foreclosure blockades, in which they disrupt auctions of foreclosed homes and other aspects of the foreclosure process, infiltration of shareholder meetings at companies like Wells Fargo to protest foreclosure and lending policies, and small-scale protests on Wall Street. In New York, the May Day strike is the centerpiece of a "spring offensive" that has included protests against student debt, financial institutions and "dirty power" as well as a series of "99 picket lines" in which workers have sought improved labor conditions. (Above, students from Paul Robeson high school explain their plans to walk out of class in protest on May Day.) 
Organizers stress that the May Day protests are simply one action among many - "another step forward, [not] the definitive or defining day by any extent," in Patrick's words. Still, there's no question that it has the potential to reengage those who largely forgot about the movement and its message when it faded from the public consciousness late last year. Meyer, of UC Irvine, says the march represents an opportunity to once again get the message out through the mainstream media - and not just to people who are "logged onto your Tumblr."
Indeed, May Day may well represent the Occupy's best chance to reclaim at least some of the broad cultural relevance it attained last year. Jacobs argues that it has already had an enduring impact, saying even those who are no engaged "had their worldviews slightly tweaked based on their experience with the movement." But she adds that if Occupy wants to be a significant force in the future, it needs to keep engaging with those beyond the sometimes self-indulgent activist left.
"People can get in their drum circle," she says, "but it's not necessarily going to move the ball forward."

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Occupy Wall Street - New Movie


Occupy Wall Street: New Movie 'Occupy Unmasked' Reviewed [Video]

April 29, 2012 07:10 AM EDT
person recommends this | comments: 5
Is Occupy Wall Street a grass roots movement? A new film, Occupy Unmasked attempts to answer that question and gives the viewer a peek into the minds of the Occupiers themselves. Sean Hannity from Fox News reviews the movie. In the interview, he says that the film shows that the movement is an "organized, coordinated effort by liberal operatives and funded by left wing mega donors".
Occupy Oakland by alexwashburnphotographySean Hannity interviews the writer/director of the film, Stephen K. Bannon and executive director David Bossie. The interview includes some fascinating and disturbing clips from the movie, which also features the late Andrew Breitbart. The preview offers a montage of democrats praising the movement, such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama, and also shows how they have disparaged the Tea Party as radicals, even with no evidence of violence at Tea Party events. In the preview, Andrew Breitbart announces, "We are finally telling you the true story behind the radicals in the Occupy movement." The film shows many incidents of violence and is quite disturbing.
Steve Bannon makes a very interesting statement about the Tea Party. He says that after their huge victory in November, 2010, the narrative changed in America (finally) to addressing the out of control spending in Washington. The news was about "raising the debt ceiling" in August, 2011, which the director points out was not good for President Obama. He continues to say that the Occupy Movement did not "just appear" and that the film shows the infrastructure under the movement.
Tax 1% For Communism! by 89AKurtWho is funding the movement? Bannon believes that it is funded by a combination of big liberal groups, such as SEIU and George Soros funded groups, which is not in dispute. Andrew Breitbart believed that the anxiety that has been taught to children in school and in college about the American System, fuelled further by liberal media figures, such as Bill Maher, is coming to a head and that these protestors are being used. The piece shows one woman who claims to be a socialist, who stated that her professors taught her that socialism was the best system.
The Occupy Wall Street website declares, "We are using the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic to achieve our ends and encourage the use of nonviolence", which is quite vague and almost endorses violence, if it is necessary. Most telling is that the movement itself does not strongly denounce the violence which occurs again and again during protests.
A preview for Occupy Unmasked is on their website and can be seen here:

Using social media to monitor Occupy movement


By
Tony Guida
(CBS News) NEW YORK - Facebook and Twitter are now essential tools for protest movements like Occupy Wall Street. Nine in 10 law enforcement agencies say they monitor social media. CBS News correspondent Tony Guida reports they are using what they find to make cases against demonstrators.
When Occupy Wall Street occupied the Brooklyn Bridge last October, police arrested 732 protesters, virtually all charged with disorderly conduct -- neither a crime nor a misdemeanor -- but a violation, like loitering.
"It's a whole lot of fuss over a politicized traffic ticket," said 23-year-old Malcolm Harris, who was among those arrested. However, he was one of just a handful whose Twitter account was subpoenaed.
The D.A. maintains that Harris' public Tweets prove his intent to defy police orders to disperse.
"It's a fishing expedition and they're going fishing for whatever information they can dredge up, whatever will make this harder on the people going out there protesting," said Harris.
Harris's lawyer, Martin Stolar, said the subpoena of Tweets in a case that is not even a crime is much ado about nothing.
"We're sitting here with this subpoena smashing a gnat with a sledgehammer, and it's absurd," said Stolar.
Judge Matthew Sciarrino disagrees. Citing Twitter's user agreement that it is authorized "to make your tweets available to the rest of the world...," he ruled that "the Tweets the defendant posted were not his," and therefore he has no standing to challenge their subpoena.
Harris plans to keep up his fight.
Twitter remains a major organizational tool for the Occupy Wall Street movement. Its power figures to be on display again next Tuesday when a huge May Day rally is planned at a park.
© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
9 Comments +